The issue of relationship is vital to thinking

 

And relationships are vital to "simple" knowledge itself.

An isolated fact is really useless: One of the best demonstrations I've ever seen is when I went to Italy during a January term when I was in high school. In a town in Sicily, the only available guide for a bus tour didn't speak English--rather a problem as we didn't speak Italian! The poor man dealt with this by looking as dignified as possible, and chanting in a sing-song voice whenever we came to a new place or work of art: "Via Roma (or whatever), Via Roma. Very Important, Very Important." At first this was funny but then it became terribly frustrating, because everything was isolated and equally Important, unrelated, and therefore ultimately useless.

Here are two other ways of approaching the same idea of how knowledge consists of relationships between facts:

Consider who you are today as a human being: Your appearance, personality, the things you care about, your strengths and weaknesses. Did you arrive at the present moment all at once and fully developed? Of course not! You're the product of your family history and your responses to all of the interactions you've had with others for your whole life. The same is true for works of art: they're the product of their culture--seen through the lens of the artist's personality and way of looking at and interpreting things.

Consider how you do complex data processing all the time--and usually without realizing how sophisticated your thought processes are: Think about someone you love dearly--a family member, spouse, or boyfriend or girlfriend. Can you think of something they'd like for their Birthday? What about something they wouldn't like--or might even find hurtful? NOW: How did you know? When I ask this question in class (stressing that the loved one and the gift are private), the usual answer is "I just know." But on further examination, folks know because they've paid attention to their loved one, and have organized the "data" of years of interaction with him or her--so they "just know" the answer.

Knowledge is not a collection of isolated facts. Knowledge is facts arranged in relationship to one another. We might think of it as a web of interrelated facts that provide a context for one another.

Another helpful image is to think of the difference between a collection of unrestrained ping pong balls and a "ball and stick" model of a molecule. If the balls are facts, the loose ping pong balls are ready to roll away and bounce. In the model of the molecule, the balls (facts) are firmly linked together by sticks. If you link your facts together, then if you forget one it's no problem. You can start from any point of the "molecule" and find your way to the fact you forgot.

 

Thinking involves seeing relationships between facts or groups of facts. And when relationships are established--when a thinker points out relationships--then the context, and the facts themselves become richer and deeper. And that depth, that richness of understanding is part of the joy and fascination of what has been called "the kingdom of the mind"

THINKING, then, requires two things:

1. Becoming very familiar with a body of information,

And THEN:

2. learning how to see relationships between facts within this body of information.

This is where intellectual work can become very creative

Images: Michael Knowles, Ping Pong Project, 2008.
MarinaVladivostok, Ball-and-stick model of rifaximin molecule. 2013