Prof. Law & Ethics
77393/06 Spring 2003
07: February 12, 2003

Reading and questions for class 08, Feb. 17:
Erwin v. Thomas
1. What is an action for damages for loss of consortium?
2. Is this case consistent with Milkovich v. Sari?
3. Is the case consistent with Hubbard Manufacturing v. Greeson?

Intellectual Property (Copyright)
Text, Chapter XII, Part III, Section A, subsections 1 and 2: pages 477 - 480.
White Smith v. Apollo
Why did the Supreme Court hold that a piano roll was not a copy of the musical composition embodied on it?